![]() these cars all came with functional induction, much more radical cams, high flow heads, ‘bulletproof’ 3.90 posi rears and their own specific carbs. The ram air cars in 67-8-9 are a different story. as you can see the 400 ho auto cars werent much different than their std 400 brethren while the 4speed 400ho counterparts did give you a little more bang for your ho buck. the 400 ho in 1968 (there was no RA III firebird in 68), recieved longbranch exh manifolds and the perf upgrade ‘068’ cam (4spd only) and carb (4speed only). the reason for this im guessing is that when you look at what the 400ho ‘added’ over the std 400 you see that it wasnt all that much, particularly for the auto cars. Unfortunately out of all the low production high performance first gen birds the 1968 400ho and 1969 400 ho and 400 RA III cars fetch only minimal premiums above the std 400 models from what ive seen. Is this too high?Ī: I would have to agree that 17K is defintely high for any non ram air coupe (even a high 2 coupe like you described). What is this car worth to you? It has basic options & includes disc brakes, rallys, rear spoiler, 400 hood and tach, ps, p ant, No air or Pw. ![]() ![]() Is $17,000 USD good value for a 400HO (L74) (code 348), #s matching & includes build sheet, is a solid # 2 car - Fully restored with NOS Quarters and front fenders, all original floors, frame rails and Mint undercarriage, 55,000 Original Miles, and Painted the Turquois irid.? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |